The Donner Wave is a digital delay pedal with a delay time from 20 up to 620ms. It comes in a very compact green aluminium die-cast housing. Despite its size, the delay provides a nice weight, thus it remains stable on the pedalboard. The rubber coating on the bottom additionally strengthens this quality. Continue reading “Review: Donner Wave delay”
For my Telecaster, I use an analog setup: A Mad Professor Sweet Honey Deluxe, a MXR Analog Chorus, a MXR Carbon Copy into a Fender Custom Vibro Champ Reverb.
At the moment, to me, it is pretty difficult to adjust the delay time of the Carbon Copy. Surely, I know that there are apps to tap the repeats manually and then they will be shown on the display. At that point, I can re-adjust the time, play again, tap again and so on.
This is a demo of the @JHS Pedals Panther Cub. It is such a nice analog dark delay with modulation and tap tempo. In contrast to many other analog delay pedals the Cub offers the possibility to pitch the signal by variing the tap devider by hand. What a pity that JHS discontinued the production…
I guess, you are well versed in planning pedalboards. I have a big studio board, which I like a lot, but for it is not even easy to manage the transport. Now, I want to assemble a smaller and more compact pedalboard. For overdrive effects I use my amp and the Ibanez Tubescreamer TS 808 and the Vahlbruch Kaluna. Due to the lack of space, delay and modulation ought to be (as far as possible) combined in one enclosure. I also think midi might be important… The Boss GT 1000 Core could be one of those which offers all the sounds I know (DD, MD and RV of the 500 series). But it also has uncountable overdrive effects that I do not need. Nevertheless, is the quality of the delay, modulation and reverb therefore worse? Do you know an alternative to the GT 1000 Core, or do you think it is ok? I really like Boss pedals, live on stage and also in the rehearsal room. And especially here, I need a compact pedalboard. In the studio I use my big pedalboard – mostly analog. By the way: I am not even a fan of editing, so a small display and a easy handling would be perfect.
Its always a bit difficult to assemble a compact pedalboard that is also flexible. The Boss GT 1000 Core might be a solution, but for you already have several overdrive pedals, it would be even better to choose a pedal that is specialized in creating delay- and reverb-effects. The more features a pedal offers, the less capacity can be used for every single effect. But if you want a multi effect anyway, the Eventide H9 might be interesting for you. It offers midi, is compact and has a superb sound. Furthermore, you can select 4 parameters per preset directly and control them via a pot. After you have successfully completed the programming, it is pretty easy to handle. But it is not able to combine several effects. Thus, it would only act as a delay or a reverb. As an alternative, you could also choose the Line6 M5. It offers midi as well, sounds pretty nice, is a real bargain, the programming is quite easy and it is compact. I use the M5 on one of my pedalboards as a supplement. But, similar to the H9, it only offers one effect at the time. The handling of the HX Stomp whereas seems somewhat confusing to me.
For most combined pedals have a certain focus, it makes sense to think about your preferences first. What is more important to you: a delay or a reverb?
The Boss devices (DD-500 and RV- 500) also offer a reverb and a delay setting. If you are looking for a flexible delay and only need a little reverb, the DD-500 might be the perfect match for you anyway.
And the Empress Echosystem offers reverb besides the numerous delay effects. For the Boss pedal as well as the Empress pedal offer the possibility to combine two presets, you would be able to get both.
But the only “real” pedal that combines delay and reverb and that can be controlled via midi is the Source Audio Collider. It is a combination of the Nemesis and the Ventris. But for a really distinguished adjustment, you will have to use the app. Anyway, if you have adjusted the basic sound (or use the presets), the pots will be sufficient to customize the sound.
Sound vs. handling
Provided that you are also looking for modulation, things will get a bit more complicated. Of course, you can use the delay part of the Collider to create effects like chorus/vibrato (modulation of the delay time) and tremolo (modulation of the level), but this is not as easy as with one of the common modulation- effect. In this case, the handling of a multi-effect would be easier. In the end, you have the choice between sound and handling.
If the pedal ought to be compact and extensively equipped at the same time, you won’t be able to avoid menus and a display to adjust your sounds. Or you chose two pedals instead of one. The Collider for superb delay/reverb and a separate modulation pedal. With midi control in addition, this might be a very good option.
It always depends on your individual preferences and needs. For there is always too little space on the pedalboard, I dispense with a modulation pedal and create the vibrato- or tremolo-effect with my delay pedals. And I can also forgo flanger and phaser. Regarding a compact pedalboard, to me it is generally more important to pare my pedals down to those which are really necessary for my music. And to be honest, I don’t like menu-diving or the use of apps as well, thus I use the space on my pedalboard for the most important effect pedals.
Mostly, it makes sense to start with a little number of pedals first and add further pedals later. Removing a (unused) pedal from the pedalboard is habitually harder. For I love delay- and reverb-sounds, I use only little space on my pedalboard for drive pedals (either booster and overdrive in one enclosure or even a single overdrive pedal). And less pedals on the board will in the end improve your basic sound.
This is a comparison of the Pigtronix Constellator with the Ibanez Echoshifter ES3. For these two are quite new at the moment, I thought, that a comparison could be interesting for guitarists with a lot of space on the pedalboard as well as for those have only little space to spare.
This is a comparison of the Ibanez Echo Shifter ES3 with the MXR Carbon Copy Deluxe. For one part of the circuit of the ES3 is completely analog, I compare the Ibanez analog delay to the MXR analog delay. Both provide modulation and tap tempo as well.
This is a comparison of the Pigtronix Constellator with the Seymour Duncan Vapor Trail.These two analog delay pedals offer almost similar features and provide cosmic sounds that create marvelous sonic galeries made of vapor and stardust. All about delays on www.delaydude.de – The delay specialist. Shop & blog for guitarists.
This is a comparison of the Ibanez Echo Shifter ES3 with the DOD Rubberneck. Both are dark analog delays with tap tempo and a beautiful modulation. Their features like the rubbernecking and the slider are inspiring for all those who like to experiment with their delay pedals.
0:11 ES3:digital mode with modulation / DOD: brightest setting with modulation
This is a comparison of the Pigtronix Constellator with the Electro Harmonix Deluxe Memory Man. Both offer beautiful percussive analog repeats and a marvellous modulation. Therefore, I was almost forced to do this comparison.
This is a demo of the Pigtronix Constellator. This tiny wonder is reminds sonically of the Deluxe Memory Man. Great sound in a small enclosure. Check out the detailed review of this analog delay pedal.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Die Cookie-Einstellungen auf dieser Website sind auf "Cookies zulassen" eingestellt, um das beste Surferlebnis zu ermöglichen. Wenn du diese Website ohne Änderung der Cookie-Einstellungen verwendest oder auf "Akzeptieren" klickst, erklärst du sich damit einverstanden.